Diatribe Descrying All Guru’s [REVISED]

This author skeptic passionately rejected Demartini’s
breakthrough experience – it did not change a thing
for him when he attended a seminar at great cost –
then he claimed there was no help for anyone there
while ignoring evidence that other people attend
with great joy

After his dramatic on site diatribe descrying all self-
help guru’s, the author changes and sweetly invites us
read his own text on mental & money problems and how to
solve them; now my question is: If, when ALL his prede-
cessors and contemporaries are avowed frauds, then how
is it only HE is to be believed

Objections he leveled against them apply equally to HIM
because of why he finds them untrue, ‘they did not work
for him’ is just as true for me – it makes me laugh; the
sudden change in tone, cajoling, inviting readers to read
more of the same tripe based on one person’s experience

And it is always wrong to put faith in claims made by a
stranger that cannot be proved objectively, it is funny he
expects readers whom he armoured against this kind of
claim to accept him on the same shaky basis – his own
research and revelations

As these authors ridicule and reject each other it is easier
to read them for fun, enlarging the scope of imagination –
while we make up our minds on the basis of personal
experience only