Dreams of Quantum Physics

“Yes: scribes of all kinds are so boring, nobody reads them,
we prefer to read the buccaneers and mavericks with lovely
ideas and theories up their sleeves who entertain & contribute
to expanding the infinite parallel realities universe of quantum
physics and allow the human mind freedom to improvise
instead of tethering it to whatever constricting definitions
keep you happy.”

*******************************

Dr Heiser’s Request:

“Dear Ancient Astronaut Enthusiast, this letter’s
intent is in research’s interest, kindly provide
answers and data to support your theories.”

MY REPLY:

Dear Doctor Heiser, As a bookworm and Pyramidiot, I
find reading Sitchin interesting and amusing, exciting
and enjoyable while other sources are boring to read;
without the imaginative Sitchin component, the clay
tablets’ contents become lacklustre.

Dr Heiser:

1. Can you please provide transcripts of Zecharia Sitchin's
academic ancient language work? I would like to post this
information on my website.

REPLY:

I would read the information with great interest – though Sitchin’s
books are interesting and riveting enough to keep the reader
happily occupied without this – it would be lovely to have it.
Since a variety of theories makes the world a richer, more
interesting place, I would love to find more imaginative
theories as different interpretations of the same
material are so gratifying.

2. Can you explain why Sitchin's work on Genesis 1:26-27 overlooks
so many obvious grammatical indications that the word elohim in that
passage refers to a single deity?

REPLY:

Good grief no, who cares?

3. Can you explain why Zecharia Sitchin (or you in turn) have not
included the comparative linguistic material from the Amarna texts
that shows the Akkadian language also uses the plural word for
"gods" to refer to a single deity or person?

REPLY:

I plead guilty your honour – the only explanation I can give for
remaining remiss in doing this is laziness and fascination with
the imagination – what reasons Sitchin has I cannot fathom,
and I don’t give a damn – please forgive Rhett Butler’s
influence… [It is all Gone WithThe Wind]

4. Can you explain how the interpretation of the word "nephilim"
as referring to "people of the fiery rockets" is viable in light
of the rules of Hebrew morphology? Can you bring forth an
ancient text where naphal has such a meaning?

REPLY:

Nope, and it does not bother me at all – I am not a scholar, you
know, and refuse to be pedantic and bore other people to death –
I leave it to others and follow the dreams of quantum physics.

5. Can you produce a text that says the Anunnaki come from
the planet Nibiru or that Nibiru is a planet beyond Pluto? Study
the 182 occurrences of "Anunnaki" in a search online at the
Electronic Corpus of Sumerian Literature website.

REPLY:

Ugh, you succeed in making these exciting ideas into the most
boring material – you do your bit and bore your students with
scientific research while the rest of us have fun, how’s that?

6. Can you explain why the alleged sun symbol on cylinder seal
VA 243 is not the normal sun symbol or the symbol for the
sun god Shamash?

REPLY:

Nope, and I couldn’t care less. Since I cannot do anything else
with Sitchin than read and enjoy him, I need not try to be
pedantic and pedagogic at all.

7. Can you explain why your god = planet equivalencies do not
match the listings of such matching in cuneiform astronomical
texts? I provided a scholarly article on the planets in cuneiform
literature as proof that Sitchin erred in this regard.

REPLY:

I am sure this must be riveting reading – I am sure those inured to
the rigours of scholarly officialese cannot wait to digest this brilliant
and marvellously exciting article!

8. Can you explain why many of Sitchin's word meanings of
Sumerian and Mesopotamian words are not consistent with
Mesopotamian cuneiform bilingual dictionaries, produced
by Akkadian scribes?

REPLY:

Yes: scribes of all kinds are so boring, nobody reads them,
we prefer to read the buccaneers and mavericks with lovely
ideas and theories up their sleeves who entertain & contribute
to expanding the infinite parallel realities universe of quantum
physics and allow the human mind freedom to improvise
instead of tethering it to whatever constricting definitions
keep you happy.

“Thank you for taking the time to respond. I will of course
post any responses on this site.”

REPLY:

The pleasure is all mine, I assure you.

“Sincerely, Michael Heiser, Ph.D.”

sitchiniswrong.com